Saturday, May 23, 2015

CEDAW as an instrument’s rights and Gender Equality: case of Nepal



Background:
Recognizing the need for a comprehensive statement of women’s entitlements to equality in a form that would be legally binding on State parties, CEDAW was adopted by the United Nations on 18th December 1979. The adoption of the Convention, the culmination of decades of international efforts to protect and promote the rights of the world’s women, was opened for signature by state parties in 1980 and came into force in September 1981. The treaty holds the states accountable for denial of women’s rights, whoever the offender.
Introduction: Nepal and CEDAW
As a member of the United Nations, Nepal is a party to a large number of international legal instruments concerning women and has also accepted the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in the application and interpretation of the instruments. Right after the restoration of the multi-party democracy system in Nepal on 22 April 1991, the then interim government ratified CEDAW without any infrastructural arrangement and reservation. The government was all too willing to ratify CEDAW, as ICCPR was ratified only on May 14, 1991 with the pressure of a few human rights organization to accede on it with the belief that ratifying the treaty at least will open avenues for human rights and women’s rights organizations and the general people to pressure the government to continuously work in the direction of creating the infrastructure required for the effective implementation of CEDAW.
Despite some attempts to popularize CEDAW, the fact of the matter is that many people including those in the decision making and implementation authorities are unaware of the ratification and existence of the Convention. After ratification of CEDAW, it was not communicated in the public media including government media. Women rights NGOs became more aware of the Convention after a CEDAW workshop organized by IWRAW Asia Pacific in 1993.
Ratifying CEDAW, the State has recognized the existence of discrimination and inequality, a strong commitment seems to have been made in the Ninth Plan to review existing legislation on women and to enact appropriate laws in accordance with the international instruments. The main goal of the plan is to achieve equality through empowerment of women in social, economic, political and legal fields and mainstreaming them into national development. These commitments are somehow transferred in the latest national policies and plan of action prepared by Ministry of Women and Social Welfare but implementation of the promises have been very weak due to the social value system, inadequate monitoring and evaluation systems for programs, poor enforcement concerning women’s rights.
Several cases on discrimination filed in the Court, challenged the legal provisions prevailing in our law. In each case, the question of State obligation under the various international instruments, Treaty Act and the Constitution were raised. However, in none of these cases did the Court try to develop the jurisprudence of State obligation under international instruments in the domestic context. Hence there is a need of a clear definition of law with the principle of equality and non discrimination. As a result of judicial interventions in many cases, the government had to submit a Bill in the Parliament acknowledging in its Preamble itself that its objective was to amend the existing discriminatory laws and maintain balance in the society since Nepal was a signatory to the Convention on Elimination of All forms of Discrimination Against Women, and also as a decision of the court.
Few initiatives to enact the special laws are taken which includes a compulsory five percent of women candidates from each political party in the general election of lower house, three seats in the upper house and 20 per cent of seats reserved in the local government as CEDAW recognizes that different policies may be formulated and applied to women in order to realize substantive rather than formal gender equality. However, these are limited measures to advance the condition of women and more activities have to be conducted to incorporate CEDAW into domestic legislation. Women have not been able to practice their rights due to the social, cultural and religious value system.
Despite the negative interpretation about the status of women in the society, the challenges against the existing laws had a positive impact as a result of which women are relatively more empowered. Because of the court decisions, the entire society was forced into rethinking the patriarchal structure, male supremacy, and the status of individual freedom of women. Women have begun to be vigilant about the issues and link them with the broader issue of equality.
Fourth and fifth report 2011
Following the popular movement of April 2006 Nepal has made significant progress in the field of gender equality and women empowerment. During this period Nepal has made significant progress in the sphere of protection to, promotion and fulfillment of the rights emanated from the CEDAW. Nepal has ratified Optional Protocol to the CEDAW. It has incorporated many significant provisions in the Interim Constitution of Nepal, 2007 and enacted many valuable legislations such as the Domestic Violence (Crime and Punishment) Act,   the Human Trafficking and Transportation (Control) Act, National Women Commission Act, the Citizenship Act, An Act to Amend some Nepalese Acts to Maintain Gender Equalities, An Act to Amend some Nepalese Acts relating to the Court Management and Administration of Justice and 11th Amendment of the Country Code.
Many laws contain affirmative provisions to facilitate women’s access to, or involvement in, various spheres of public activities. Legislative moves are afoot to amend some 60 more discriminatory provisions in the law, to outlaw harmful social practices and to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace. Accordingly many rules are framed and plans, action plans and programmes are being implemented. Out of 45% reserved seats, 20% seats are allocated for women only in government services. Women's literacy has been increased significantly and school-drop-out rate of girls has declined. Sharp decline of Maternal Mortality Rate is worth to mention. Abortion and delivery facilities have been expanded throughout the country. Social security for women in general and widows in particular have been increased and expanded. Gender budgeting system is introduced, where the proposed budget for fiscal year 2011/12, 19% is directly planned for women related programs and 45% is indirectly responsive in closing the gender gap.
Conclusion:
However, the policy of adopting special provisions regarding international instruments in domestic legislation has generally been followed by the state for providing women their rights. Ironically, programs for the implementation of such policies are not adequate. As a result, there is no significant improvement in the situation of women’s human rights and the international commitments made by the country in this regard have remained mere commitments with less achievement. The challenge, therefore, is to recognize the need of stable and accountable government, who are aware about their commitment nationally, internationally with the political commitment and to have strong NGO monitoring.
Dhan Prasad Pandit
Assocoate professor Gender Studies and Political Science Department .
Padma Kanya Campus T. U. 2070 BS .

0 comments: